Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 25,341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2025, 9:08 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, at least in part, but would extend immunity far more broadly. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm by Richard Primus
             Amidst the predictable chaos, cavalier illegality, and general destruction of the first weeks of the new Trump Administration, it is unfortunately necessary to remember the following fact: there are no foreseeable circumstances under which President Trump could be removed from office through the impeachment process. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
In 2019 and 2020, Said referred to Diemert as a "colonist" and claimed he was to "blame for all injustices in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court suggested an explanation for these and other missing powers in its famous 1936 decision, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Yang Tengbo was excluded from the United Kingdom in March 2023. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am by Kalvis Golde
United States 24-482Issue: Whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act is penal for purposes of the Constitution’s ex post facto clause. [read post]
Coughenour rejected this argument as, among other things, contravening longstanding precedent in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 6:32 am by Scott Bomboy
The president does not have the direct power to set or impose tariffs on nations that trade with the United States, and can only take such action if a law is passed by Congress granting him such powers. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm by Just Security
Wong Kim Ark (1898), explicitly grants birthright citizenship for all people born in the United States.2025-01-31 Immigration and CitizenshipExecutive Action: Birthright Citizenship (Executive Order)State of New Jersey et al v. [read post]