Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 25,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2025, 1:28 pm by Ilya Somin
As I explained in a recent article in Just Security, this would be a blatant violation of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone "born … in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 11:49 am by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In the midst of writing this post yesterday, January 6th, I thought back to that day in 2021 when Donald Trump attempted a coup in the United States to seize the presidency despite having lost the 2020 election. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
United States—in which Native Americans are challenging the federal government's plan to destroy a sacred site by turning it into a copper mine. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 9:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in the SEC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 4:02 am by Charles Sartain
 In the latest interation of United States and Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
4 Jan 2025, 10:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Cal. 2022) (issuing an injunction against "threatening or harassing emails" and other conduct); United Artists Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm by Marty Lederman
          Fifth, Trump insists in the brief (p.3) that he “opposes banning TikTok in the United States at this juncture. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Anderson (ruling that states could not determine eligibility for federal office), City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 7:02 am by Molly Buckley
The Supreme Court has set this case, Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 2:30 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
The trial court granted United’s request in its entirety, ruling: “United has shown a legitimate nondiscriminatory basis for terminating [Wawrzenski], and [she] does not show substantial evidence that the reasons given for the termination were pretextual [an excuse to cover up the true discriminatory reasons]. [read post]