Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 25,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 7:14 am
United States (07-214) and Exxon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:57 am
United States (13-316). [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:57 pm
United States, pointing out how the Court's recent opinion in Caniglia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:42 am
On June 30, 2016, the SJC granted Further Appellate Review on the parties' cross-petitions in Blanchard v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:55 am
United States is here. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
Supreme Court Merits Briefs Nebraska Opening Brief Cert Stage Briefs State of Nebraska v Parker cert petition United States Cert Opp Brief Eighth Circuit Materials CA8 Opinion Nebraska Opening Brief Tribe Brief US Brief Nebraska Reply Brief District Court Materials The 2nd amended complaint is here: Complaint The tribal motion to dismiss is here: Motion to Dismiss The opposition is here: Opposition to Motion to Dismiss The reply is here: Reply Brief The… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:41 am
Colvin, March 7, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
Hollowell A recent United States Supreme Court decision handed down in May addressed what occurred when contract, bankruptcy, and intellectual property laws intersected.[1] In Mission Products Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
However under the AEDPA when a state court has considered a matter on its merits a Federal Court can only grant a writ of habeas corpus when the state court’s decision either “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or “(2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination… [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:33 pm
Earlier this month, on November 10, 2015, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Bouaphakeo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
Here: Fort Peck Cert Petition Question presented: Whether an action for the restoration of grant in aid funds illegally recouped by the United States constitutes a suit for specific relief such that the United States’ sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:16 am
Petitioner did not consent or acquiesce to the Child’s retention in the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The Taxing Power itself is granted in Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, which says: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. [read post]