Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 28,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applied this provision when it refused Steve Elster’s application to register the phrase “Trump Too Small” as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm by Béligh Elbalti
The judgment was later confirmed by the Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal’s ruling No. 31/2024 of 29 January 2024 but subsequently overturned by the aforementioned ADSC’s decision reported here.[5] It is worth recalling that, in this particular case, the ADSC clearly stated that the Civil Marriage Law does not apply to foreign Muslims irrespective of their origins. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:14 pm by
Co., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted Defendants’ (collectively, “Aon”) motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiffs’ lack of standing as third-party beneficiaries and failure to file within the statute of limitations. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
TaxProf Blog Op-Ed: Moore Decides Less, by Andy Grewal (Iowa; Google Scholar): When the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Moore v. [read post]
 After being denied more information about the valuation, plaintiffs sued, alleging that the units were worth at least $60.00 per unit. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
In the New York Times interview with “several Trump advisers,” including Miller, to whom the campaign itself referred questions, the Times summarized their plans: “People who were granted temporary protected status because they are from certain countries deemed unsafe, allowing them to lawfully live and work in the United States, would have that status revoked. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 11:18 am by Roberto Rodrigues Pinho (RNA Law)
The agreements included provisions that allowed parties to up to 10 years of exclusivity in the supply to the government, regardless of the existence of granted patents, which ended up with lawsuits challenging PDPs contract due to patent infringement. [read post]