Search for: "Gravel v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
The NWPR was enacted during the Trump administration and represents the EPA’s latest attempt to define the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
See, e.g., United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:07 am
Perkins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
” In Gravel v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 6:27 am
Houston Aquarium, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” In 1972, the Supreme Court clarified in Gravel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
State Bar of Wisconsin 19-831Issue: Whether Lathrop v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 3:34 pm
United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945) (citation omitted). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
United States in Kermit L. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:59 am
Citing State v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:18 am
The 2018 Amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG) were unanimously adopted by the U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
And in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:15 am
United States (W.D.N.Y.): 9-1 Motion to Dismiss 12 Opposition 13 Reply 14 Magistrate R&R 15 US Objections 16 Perkins Objections 19 US Response 20 Perkins Response 21 US Reply 22 Perkins Reply 24 DCT Order An excerpt: This case presents what appears to be an issue of first impression: whether a treaty between the United States and Native Americans ensuring the free use and enjoyment of tribal land bars taxes on income derived directly from the land—here,… [read post]
