Search for: "Graves v. Department Of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
AUTO - GRAVES AMENDMENT - RELATION BACK DOCTRINE Flederbach v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
The court never stated abuse to Lemus could not produce the requisite grave risk to A.O.L., but, instead, recited the correct legal standard. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
In Bardales v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:27 pm
In King v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In Landor v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
‘Exposing a Grave Injustice’: Montreal Exclusivity and the Rights of Disabled Passengers On March 5, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Stott v Thomas Cook (previewed for the UK Supreme Court blog last autumn here). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:12 pm
The decision of First Department, in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
Fatima Goss Graves is the president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
The court expressed “grave doubts” as to whether an appellant could effectively run his case without giving oral evidence to the tribunal. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:41 am
CONTRIBUTED BY Patricia V. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:41 am
CONTRIBUTED BY Patricia V. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:48 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Marvin Graves v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department (Taxation) Mathieu v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
McNEIL,Secretary,Department of Corrections,State of Florida, Respondents.____________________________________/ PETITION SEEKING TO INVOKE THIS COURT'S ALL WRITS JURISDICTION AND APPLY TO THIS COURTFOR A STAY OF EXECUTION Article V, Section 3(b)(1) and (7) of the FloridaConstitution gives this Court exclusive appellate jurisdictionover all capital cases and the ability to issue "all writsnecessary to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
While studying at college, Mrs Rhuppiah met Ms Charles who suffers from a gravely debilitating illness. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
DOE thereupon appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Dempsey v New York City Department of Education, 25 NY3d 291, the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the Supreme Court's decision "on the law" and dismissed Petitioner's Article 78 action.The court explained that the denial of Petitioner's application for security clearance for a position as a public school cleaner has a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Not only does it seem correct as a matter of principle, but also the lack of a lawful power to detain is likely, without more, to give rise to practical difficulties. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:43 pm
Department of Labor and Biden v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
