Search for: "Graves v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2022, 11:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled on oil and gas Lease 257 issued by the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:12 am
”Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s decision overruling his panel opinion. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
The Court reaffirmed the narrow contours of the Second Amendment right recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
In Chesanovska v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:29 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:40 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:33 am
” “Nothing in U.S. law authorizes ICE to detain people in foreign countries, but that appears to be of no concern to the Trump administration,” said Arthur Spitzer, senior counsel at the ACLU of the District of Columbia. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
See Tsai-Yi Yang v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:51 am
Below is the table of contents: Construction and Application of United States Supreme Court Holding in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
Initially passed in 1965, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act required “covered jurisdictions,” at first in the Deep South and later extended to Texas, Arizona, Alaska, and certain counties and townships in other states, to “pre-clear” any changes in their election laws with the Justice Department or the District Court of the District of Columbia before putting them into effect. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
In a comprehensive and careful 151-page opinion, a federal district court in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
” Monasky v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:04 pm
On May 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. [read post]
