Search for: "Gray v. Georgia" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
Why is this part in light gray, kinda hard to read? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
Escondido, both the decision itself (blue Georgia) and its syllabus (black Georgia), to understand why:   Nobody has asked the Supreme Court the right question. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm by fjhinojosa
Mott—An Old Gray Mare—Reexamined Through Its Own History, 82 La. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  Georgia appellate courts have also barred claims against pharmacists. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Ryan (Southern Methodist University)   Criminal Justice 09: Criminal Law Stories Time: Fri, Jun 8 - 2:30pm - 4:15pm Place: HHV, TBA20  Session Participants: Chair: Donna Coker (University of Miami) The Story of Wanrow: Reasonableness, Gender, and Self-Defense *Donna Coker (University of Miami) Accomplice Liability and the Murderous Judge *Leo Katz (University of Pennsylvania) Robinson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm by Richard Briffault
Existing state laws authorized some of these actions; others occupied legal gray areas, as neither explicitly authorized nor explicitly prohibited. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]