Search for: "Gray v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
" 3 Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 1773, at 652 (Boston, Hilliard, Gray 1833). [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am by Dave
 So, although I see Gray v Taylor and this case as perpetuating a kind of Elizabethan and Victorian paternalism, I am not sure whether that attack was going to succeed. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Alternatively please see in Gray v Taylor [1998] 1 WLR 1093. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Case law indicates that a probationary employee may be terminated at any time after the completing his or her minimum period of probation prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation [see Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904] unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14]. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Roy McMurtry John Saywell The Law of the Land: The Advent of the Torrens System in Canada by Greg Taylor The Grand Experiment: Law and Legal Culture in British Settler Societies edited by Hamar Foster, Benjamin Berger, A.R. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Finally, the court noted that the defendant was legally under “no obligation to advise plaintiff who to sue,” Gray v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]