Search for: "Great American Insurance Company v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The American Coal Company v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The great majority of these cases get the back of the judicial hand. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is an unusual court. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Can Congress use the Spending Clause to Steward Machine Company v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
Paul Morgan controlled several banks, Western Union, the Pullman Car Company, Aetna Life Insurance, General Electric and 2-1 railroad companies. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
After West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
” This, according to Spokeo, is the same QP as in First American Financial v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Lowell v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
[contains] all the learning on the Constitution brought down to the latest period, so as to be invaluable to the lawyer, statesman, politician, and in fine, to every citizen who aims to have a knowledge of the great Charter under which he lives. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Under the settlement filed in federal court in Columbia, S.C., Norfolk Southern will be required to pay a civil penalty of $3,967,500 for the alleged CWA violations, to be deposited in the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
That's three.And, perhaps reflecting its federal roots, the highest court in the District of Columbia has applied Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards several times, in Murray v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
He emphasized that the Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia and general counsel for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. [read post]
