Search for: "Green v. Liter"
Results 141 - 160
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2012, 7:45 am
What the Department downplayed, however, were the literally hundreds of state and federal subsidies—totaling billions of taxpayer dollars—that are available to U.S. producers and consumers of alternative or “green” energy products such as solar panels, wind towers, or biofuels. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48, Cal.4th 481; Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48, Cal.4th 481; Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
In Arnstein v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
In Carom v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm
In Carom v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
As a result of the Forman case and the SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm
Indeed, the UK must still allow at least some prisoners the vote, as required by the 2005 judgment in Hirst v UK (No.2) and the 2010 judgment in Greens & MT v UK. [read post]
3 May 2012, 7:13 am
(See McCollum v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
Aon Risk v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
See, Notte v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:46 pm
“From a taxpayer/consumer standpoint, it doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense that we would require blenders to pay fines or fees or whatever for stuff that literally isn’t available,” said Dennis V. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:59 am
The list of potentially protectable beliefs under the Religion and Philosophy part of the Equality Act was added to, with belief in “Green issues” established last year by Grainger PLC v Nicholson, being joined by a belief in the ethos of the Joe Hashman BBC, and being fervently opposed to fox hunting (Hashman v Orchard Park Garden Centre). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert In the Oracle v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]