Search for: "Green v. Sears Roebuck & Co"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2017, 7:05 am
” Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Bashlin Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:22 am
It found this case similar to Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2 (1994), stating: In 1960, the Legislature passed the Consumer Fraud Act “to permit the Attorney General to combat the increasingly widespread practice of defrauding the consumer. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:03 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 312 N.J. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
CAPITAL ONE BANK AND CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01539-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-29-08)08-0272 DEALERS ELECTRICAL SUPPLY CO. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Ars Technica) CAFC: Co-inventors contribution must be 'more than the exercise of ordinary skill'; NTP awarded attorneys' fees: Oren Tavory v NTP (Patently-O) (Law360) (Law360) (Property, intangible) (Patent Prospector) (Property, intangible) PTO announces no IDS or Markush Rules during Bush Administration (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs) Global Global - General Exploding the intangible asset market cap myth (IP Think Tank) … [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
