Search for: "Green v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
Equality of protection under the laws implies not only accessibility by each one, whatever his race, on the same terms with others to the courts of the country for the security of his person and property, but that in the administration of criminal justice he shall not be subjected, for the same offense, to any greater or different punishment. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
In the individuals’ capacity as managersor administrators (or employees) of the companies, it is difficult to see how federal law substantially burdens their religious exercise, because it would be other persons (such as third-party plan administrators) who would engage in the relevant actions (e.g., reimbursements) that are said to facilitate the use of contraception, and nothing in federal law requires the Greens or the Hahns to perform any such role. 7. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
Thompson gave DHS the green light to move forward. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:13 am
Uzamere should've read the fine print.In Uzamere v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 7:51 am
“Washing” Claims Under Scrutiny Regulators ramped up their focus on deceptive marketing practices, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence (“AI-washing”) and environmental, social, and governance (“green-washing”) investments. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Greene’s Energy Group and Lucia v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Green: two issues. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
One could write entire articles about the importance of "The New Property"--to constitutional law, administrative law, social welfare law, and legal theory. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am
” The question now before the court is whether that 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Green Development, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Buried in the opinion, like the per curiam, is the notion that national security justifications are merely another element of administrative law, and imposed an obligation on the administrator to justify the action by reference and at a level of persuasiveness that is left to the courts. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
., Bull v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, some state officials banned the consideration of social or political interests when making investment decisions for state pension funds or have redirected state funds away from large asset managers because these officials claim the companies are prioritising political and social agendas over duties to clients. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:51 pm
Data and Information Sharing: The Commissioner of Social Security must information to the Secretary of DHS regarding data contained within the Social Security database as in relates to employment verification. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
Certain debts to same-sex spouses or former spouses should be excepted from discharge. *** The Social Security Administration will pay death benefits to survivors of a same-sex marriage. [read post]
