Search for: "Greene v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 12:50 pm
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:50 pm
While the V visa is currently available only to spouses and minor children of green card holders, the bill would extend the V nonimmigrant visa to families sponsored by a legal permanent resident. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
Google Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By User Suspended Over ‘Bowling Green Massacre’–Shulman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:27 am
See Green v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997) Lujan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:11 am
†See Rajah v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm
They are eligible to petition for a green card without a break in their stay and employment in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
United States, No. 13-10352 (decided Mar. 2, 2015). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
Florida a replay of United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Google Facebook Defeats Lawsuit By User Suspended Over ‘Bowling Green Massacre’–Shulman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 12:01 pm
Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 713 (2011), quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
An individual granted U Nonimmigrant status may, after threecontinuous years of physical presence in the United States, apply for a green card. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
” – Rod Serling would appreciate the intricate issue presented in Greene v. [read post]