Search for: "Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc."
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The California Supreme Court is widely credited as the originator of strict product liability as a means of tort recovery for its pronouncement in Greenman v Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 57, 62: "A manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places into the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that caused injury to a human being. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:04 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc., 59 Cal. 2d 57 (Cal. 1963).) [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Whatever the merits of Greenman v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:44 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal. 2d 57, made it easier for injured parties to recover for products that cause injury to them. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 57, 62 (Greenman) established the doctrine of strict products liability when it held “a manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that causes injury to a human being. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
Yuba Power Prods., Inc., 59 Cal. 2d 57, 377 P.2d 897 (Cal. 1963) (power tool designed for home use). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
’” The court revisited its 1963 decision in Greenman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:05 am
’” The court revisited its 1963 decision in Greenman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:04 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc., 59 Cal. 3d 57 (1963), where Justice Traynor wrote that “a manufacturer is strictly liable in tort when an article he places on the market, knowing that it is to be used without inspection for defects, proves to have a defect that causes injury to a human being. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:36 am
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal. 2d 57, a plaintiff alleging manufacturing defect only has to show that there is a product that was manufactured and that product failed causing injury. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Yuba Power Products, some fifty years ago. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc. (1963) 59 Cal. 2d 57, removed the requirement that the plaintiff prove negligence in order to recover damages from a manufacturer of a defective product. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
Yuba Power Products, Inc. in California in 1963 and the ALI’s adoption of § 402A of the Restatement (2d) of Torts in 1964 (published in 1965) fueled the spectacular development of modern products liability law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Greenman v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:47 pm
” (Greenman v. [read post]
