Search for: "Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
And in the process the Court endorsed the view of five concurring and dissenting Justices in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Eugene Volokh
And in the process the Court endorsed the view of five concurring and dissenting Justices in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has also said yes: Five Justices took that view in a libel case, Dun & Bradstreet v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749 (1985), which specifically rejected a media/nonmedia distinction in libel cases. [read post]