Search for: "Greenwood v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 8:57 am by Alfred Brophy
(I know, I know, the editorial board at the Daily Oklahoman will say, they support the "death sentence that cold-blooded killers are given in this state. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Yuval Shany
The reasonable prospect of success standard articulated by Judge Christopher Greenwood has not been invoked, at least not explicitly, by other judges; still, the Court did appear to suggest in previous cases that a finding of plausibility should follow “a careful examination of the evidence and arguments presented” (see e.g., Costa Rica v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
Majorstake Limited (Respondents) v Curtis (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 10. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
  Part II focuses on the new CIA guidelines and their treatment of publicly available information and related issues, including bulk collection, querying, retention and dissemination, and undisclosed participation in organizations inside the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
It sounds as if there were some middle men that the CDC contracted with to get these substances from a foreign country into the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Joseph Scott Miller, United States Supreme Court Ip Cases, 1810-2019: Measuring & Mapping the Citation Networks, 69 Cath. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
She had been studying to become a teacher in the United States Virgin Islands and was survived by her husband and 12-year-old daughter. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am by SOIssues
The Court stated that this issue had been broached in Greenwood v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]