Search for: "Gregory Garre" Results 61 - 80 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm by Kedar
Gregory Garre leads all attorneys in private practice with his fourth argument of the term in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Kedar Bhatia
Among lawyers in private practice, Latham & Watkins partner Gregory Garre leads the pack with three appearances before the Court. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Thomas Merrill
Gregory Garre argued that portages of any length do not defeat navigability; indeed, they only confirm that the river was being used for commerce and hence was navigable. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm
Paul Clement represented the power company, and Gregory Garre represented the state of Montana. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Kedar
The three advocates who will argue in that case–Paul Clement, Gregory Garre, and Edwin Kneedler–have a combined 200 arguments before the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by Kedar
Former Solicitor General Gregory Garre is scheduled to argue twice during the December sitting, a relatively uncommon feat for private practice lawyers. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm by Steve Hall
Former Bush Administration Solicitor General Gregory Garre is now representing Maples. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:10 am by brian
Former Solicitor General Gregory Garre, now representing petitioner Cory Maples, began by arguing that either of two scenarios, standing alone, should be enough to excuse his client’s procedural default:  (1) the state’s role in failing to follow up when the orders notifying Maples’s Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers were returned unopened; or (2) the actions of the Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers in leaving the firm without notifying the court or arranging for… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
” Although the rule announced by the Court’s decision may not reflect these precise contours, Cory Maples does seem likely to get at least the first step toward what (as Gregory Garre emphasized) he seeks:  “an opportunity to present a serious constitutional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to a Federal habeas court on the merits. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Garre explained.The question in the case is really not who shot the victim. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am by Steve Hall
And: Maples’s new attorney, Gregory G. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
Montana, and notes that two former Solicitors General – Paul Clement and Gregory Garre – will face off in the case. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:32 am by Steve Hall
"Due process requires no less when a life is at stake," wrote Gregory Garre, a Washington lawyer representing Maples in Washington. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Maples was actively represented by attorneys at the big firm at all relevant times.Maples is now represented by former Bush Administration Solicitor General Gregory Garre. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The Legal Pulse blog of the Washington Legal Foundation interviews former Solicitor General Gregory Garre on the Solicitor General’s Office, the October 2010 Term, and the Court’s shrinking docket. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
Maples is represented at the Supreme Court by former Solicitor General, Gregory Garre. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm by David Oscar Markus
Here is the NY Times coverage of the case after former SG Gregory Garre of Latham & Watkins filed the cert petition.Full disclosure -- I worked on the NACDL amicus brief filed in the 11th Circuit. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:52 pm by Nathan Koppel
S&C hired former U.S. solicitor general Gregory Garre to try to convince the Supreme Court to consider its claim that Maples should not be blamed for a mistake made by the firm. [read post]