Search for: "Griggs v. Duke Power Co" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Duke Power Co. at 67 Vanderbilt Law Review 197 (2014). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Duke Power Co., brought by thirteen African American employees who worked as common laborers and janitors at one of Duke Power’s facilities. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:31 pm by MorelliRatner
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which explained the centrality of the disparate-impact concept to effective enforcement of Title VII.read more [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:04 pm by Tracy Russo
Duke Power Co. in favor of 13 African American workers, the Supreme Court held that employers may not use tests or [...] [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Dukes Power Co." published in Vanderbilt Law Review. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 91 S.Ct. 849, 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
  Source: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/disparate_impact_unintentional_discrimination/ https://legaldictionary.net/griggs-v-duke-power-co/ https://newsone.com/3780050/racial-discrimination-shaving-facial-hair-razor-bumps-dreadlocks-african-americans/ https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2016-05-09Read More [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
Duke Power Co. to Title VII employment discrimination claims to also apply to lending discrimination claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm
Duke Power Co., which was decided just two years after race discrimination in the workplace became illegal, is a prime example. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:16 pm
Duke Power Co., which was decided just two years after race discrimination in the workplace became illegal, is a prime example. [read post]