Search for: "Griggs v. Duke Power Co." Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Duke Power Gun control Guns Guns Guns and demonstrations Gunslingers Hamas Hamas Happy holidays Harassment Hard-working Harm Harris v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power and Albemarle Paper Co. v Moody, which expanded the law of employment discrimination to prohibit disparate racial impacts of racially neutral policies; and Thornburg v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal, 1917-1946… [read post]
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), held that Title VII’s disparate impact section, which, at the time, was identical to the current ADEA language, extended to both employees and job applicants. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
  Source: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/disparate_impact_unintentional_discrimination/ https://legaldictionary.net/griggs-v-duke-power-co/ https://newsone.com/3780050/racial-discrimination-shaving-facial-hair-razor-bumps-dreadlocks-african-americans/ https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2016-05-09Read More [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which strongly suggest that § 703(a)(2), the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, where the Court interpreted § 703(a)(2) of Title VII and held that disparate impact was a viable theory of liability. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
McClung (379 U.S. 294, 1964) upholding the right of the federal government to mandate desegregation in restaurants; and Griggs v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Duke Power Co., of nearly identical language of Title VII, which has been held to protect job seekers. [read post]