Search for: "Grogan v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 1:52 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of assault and robbery with dangerous weapon Charged with multiple offenses in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, for his role in two armed carjackings involving two different victims — Anna Cruz and Andreas Piedra — Dorain Jereal Grogan, appellant, entered into a plea agreement with the State. ... [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:56 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Grogan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Volunteer ambulance organization held not a “state actor” for the purposes of the Fourteenth AmendmentGrogan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:39 am
Rescinding a letter of resignationGrogan v Holland Patent CSD, App. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
After briefing was completed in this case and while a decision was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:21 pm by ADeStefano
"Finally, Justice Tom stated that the decisions of the First Department in this regard were contrary not only to the Court of Appeals, but also to the other three Departments of the Appellate Division, which have all found that questions of fact existed as to the adequacy of the safety device where the injured worker fell after receiving an electric shock (see Grogan v Norlite Corp., 282 A.D.2d 781 [3d Dept 2001]; Donovan v CNY Consol. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:14 am by ADeStefano
"Finally, Justice Tom stated that the decisions of the First Department in this regard were contrary not only to the Court of Appeals, but also to the other three Departments of the Appellate Division, which have all found that questions of fact existed as to the adequacy of the safety device where the injured worker fell after receiving an electric shock (see Grogan v Norlite Corp., 282 A.D.2d 781 [3d Dept 2001]; Donovan v CNY Consol. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Grogan and Jeannine McSweeney, and Associate Jake Phillips of the Simpson Thacher law firm take a look at key issues employers should consider when contemplating compensation reductions for employees and non-employee directors during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]