Search for: "Groomes v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 8:41 am by Howard Friedman
In an unusual order (full text) yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an injunction barring the Arkansas Department of Corrections from enforcing its grooming policy against Muslim inmate Gregory Holt "to the extent that it prohibits applicant from growing a one-half-inch beard in accordance with his religious beliefs." [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm by Zachary Spilman
On Monday, CAAF released it’s fourth opinion of the term in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by Howard Friedman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 8:35 am by Shirin Afsous
These marital contracts provide significant legal challenges in the United States, where some jurisdictions construe the Muslim marriage contract as a prenuptial agreement, and others interpret them based on neutral principles of contract law. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thompson (Prisoners – Grooming Policies) on May 2, 2016. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 2:19 pm by Jeremy Morley
MorleyUpon re-reading the recent decision of the Supreme Court of India in Gupta v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:44 am
The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals published a new opinion yesterday, United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:07 am
United States (07-9086) and Megginson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2012, 11:44 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff contended that the Department of Corrections' grooming policy violates his rights under the free exercise clause and RLUIPA.In Lomax v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]