Search for: "Grooms v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2025, 4:17 pm
However, researching case law provides an important update: this law was found unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
Our latest post explored the Department of Defense’s (DoD) efforts to ban transgender individuals from serving in the military consistent with President Donald Trump’s Executive Order on transgender service. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 11:40 am
Recently, I read the decision of Nigro v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 9:44 am
Since then, many other states and municipalities have adopted similar measures. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
That leaves estimates of between 4,000 to 12,000 transgender service members who might be eligible to remain, provided they are willing to comply with requirements related to gender identity and biological sex such as grooming and uniform standards, bathroom and other intimate space restrictions, physical testing, and pronoun usage as dictated by the administration. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:41 am
Under Miller v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:22 am
See CCIA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:58 am
On 7 February 2025, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) heard argument over the release to the media of documents from the case of H6 v Secretary of State for the Home Department (SC/205/2023). [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 2:36 pm
From M.H. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:03 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am
The Commission has contacted EU member states to trace any Bluesky offices within the region but has not reached out to the company directly. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am
Greene: One of the things I get concerned about with the focus on design is that, like, a state Attorney General is not going to be upset if the design has kids reading a lot of bible verses or tomes about being respectful to your parents. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:08 am
Read the decision and order here: Download Zabielski v The North Shore. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 10:21 am
” State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 1:29 pm
Md.) in Hart v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:07 am
The Moody v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
Susan V. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 8:49 am
” Marshall v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:49 am
” Groome also cited his ability to interpret the new Title IX rule under the Administrative Procedures Act (or APA) and the Supreme Court’s new precedent in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
