Search for: "Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
FBL Financial Services, Inc., a case involving whether a plaintiff alleging a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act must present "direct evidence" of discrimination to be entitled to a mixed-motive jury instruction. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:18 pm by Joe Markowitz
FBL Financial Services, Inc., decided that age discrimination cases should not follow the same burden of proof analysis that the Court has applied in other kinds of discrimination cases. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Todd Hanchett
FBL Financial Services Inc, that had made it more difficult for older workers to prove claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:14 am by Buckley & Klein
FBL Financial Services, Inc. (08-441), decided by a 5-4 margin, decided a burden of proof issue that had never been completely resolved since the passage of the ADEA in 1967. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:04 pm
FBL Financial Services, Inc., Jack Gross, a 54-year old employee filed a complaint against FBL Financial Services, alleging that the company demoted him from a claims administration director to a claims project coordinator because of his age. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am by Adam Schlossman
FBL Financial Services Inc. (2009), which requires plaintiffs alleging age discrimination to establish that their age was the sole cause of the employer's actions. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:22 am by Michael Moore
FBL Financial Services, Inc. creates a rift between the treatment of so called "mixed-motive" cases under the ADEA and Title VII. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:48 am by Pauline M.K. Young
FBL Financial Services, Inc. and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v Nassar indicate that a “motivating factor” test is inappropriate. [read post]