Search for: "Gross v. Johnson" Results 121 - 140 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  In more rural areas, the county attorney’s office for that jurisdiction will prosecute the petty misdemeanors, misdemeanors, and gross misdemeanors that occur within the cities, townships, and municipalities. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm by Michael Grossman
Both drugs are manufactured by Janssen Pharmaceutical, a subsidiary of the parent corporation Johnson & Johnson. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Faranda had been adjudicated delinquent for gross sexual imposition in 2004. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 4:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Many legal scholars have written on this issue but none as much as Chief Justice Marshall in Johnson v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:41 am
This is the result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Legal Action Center of the American Immigration Council on AILA's behalf with Steptoe & Johnson LLP, AILA v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Earl Drott
The trucker’s family filed suit against the motorist and Volvo in the District Court of Johnson County, asserting claims for design defect, marketing defect, negligence, and gross negligence. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Lord Justice Gross and Mr Justice Irwin in Chambers v DPP (known as the ‘Twitter joke trial’ – Lord Justice Gross then ordered an adjournment of the case to be heard before constitution of three judges. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
And he saw that the third petition was a case from Arkansas that raised the same issue, Johnson v. [read post]