Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 181 - 200
of 430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
Bollinger decision affirming the validity of diversity in education as a compelling state interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
In Fisher I, a seven-to-one majority declined to question the Court’s prior precedents (including its seminal 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
At Breyer’s urging, Kennedy took a different tack; instead of rolling back the scope of preferences permitted by Grutter v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
Bollinger, on the same day it upheld the discrimination in Grutter. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm
Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Bollinger). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Bakke (1978) and Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Prior to its 2013 decision in the present case, the last time the High Court addressed the issue of affirmative action in higher education admissions was in June 2003 when it upheld, by a 5-4 vote, the University of Michigan’s consideration of race as one of many “plus factors” in its law school admissions policy that considered the overall individual contribution of each candidate (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
Bollinger. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
This was a major change from the Supreme Court’s previous decision in Grutter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
” Twenty-five years later, in the landmark case of Grutter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:33 am
In a recently posted paper (forthcoming in the Southern California Law Review), Stephen Rich argues for a way to reconstruct the legal conception of diversity—narrowly endorsed in Grutter v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
(Here's the Justice Thomas opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
Taking those two together, as I believe is correct when there is no majority opinion, see CJLF's brief in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
Bollinger. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 8:15 am
University of Texas and his dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
See Grutter v. [read post]
