Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 261 - 280
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:46 am
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
The Supreme Court, according to the appellee, encouraged race-neutral policies in Grutter v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
Bollinger] and Fisher comes in. [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
Fisher is largely an attempt to seek a do-over of the Court’s 2003 opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:07 am
Recall that in Grutter v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:08 am
As the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held last year in upholding the constitutionality of the plan, UT-Austin carefully crafted its plan to comply with the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
It follows on the heels of the Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm
Bollinger. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:40 pm
University of Texas 2003 Supreme Court opinion on Grutter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:25 am
As the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held last year in upholding the constitutionality of the plan, UT-Austin carefully crafted its plan to comply with the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Bollinger. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:07 am
Bollinger. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:47 pm
Justice O’Connor noted in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Bollinger decision. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
On the other hand, I doubt there will be five justices willing to overrule Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:34 pm
” As Sacks notes, in 2003 the Supreme Court upheld by a 5-4 vote in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:50 pm
” As Sacks notes, in 2003 the Supreme Court upheld by a 5-4 vote in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:51 am
Keywords: Grutter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
Bollinger; and 2) If so, whether Grutter v. [read post]