Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger" Results 101 - 120 of 368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am by Freddie Whittle
Moreover, back in 2003, Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor set the timer after the case of Grutter v Bollinger 539 U.S. 306 (2003), suggesting the affirmative action should not be a necessary tool within 25 years. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:17 am
But it should be a benefit to the students who are admitted under the program, and if it is not, then they are being used for the (purported) benefit of the whole group of students.The key precedent, Grutter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Meaning of “Sunsetting” Language in Grutter The conservative justices invoked language from the end of Justice O’Connor’s majority opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bollinger, university officials moved quickly to adopt their own “Grutter”-style policy. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm by Melissa Hart
Bollinger decision affirming the validity of diversity in education as a compelling state interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am by Andrew Grossman and Ilya Shapiro
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
  In Fisher I, a seven-to-one majority declined to question the Court’s prior precedents (including its seminal 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm by Richard Sander
  At Breyer’s urging, Kennedy took a different tack; instead of rolling back the scope of preferences permitted by Grutter v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Roger Clegg
Bollinger, on the same day it upheld the discrimination in Grutter. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Second, the Court has shown no inclination to overrule outright the most recent ruling allowing the use of race in college admissions — its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]