Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 161 - 180
of 435
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2016, 8:17 am
Bollinger. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Board of Education in 1954 (which struck down school segregation) through Grutter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
” Kennedy’s vote also reflects a significant evolution from his dissenting opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
There’s no way around the fact that, to end racial preferences here, it must overturn Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm
Instead, Kennedy makes clear that Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
University of Texas at Austin is a sound win for diversity and Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
(Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:04 am
The Supreme Court had just handed down its decision in Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
Bollinger), race-conscious efforts to avoid discrimination against nonwhites (Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
He notes that on the day in 2003 when the Court reaffirmed the ability of universities to consider race in admissions, in Grutter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
The vote in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 am
Citing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent in Fisher I, Grutter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), and Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
Moreover, back in 2003, Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor set the timer after the case of Grutter v Bollinger 539 U.S. 306 (2003), suggesting the affirmative action should not be a necessary tool within 25 years. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:17 am
But it should be a benefit to the students who are admitted under the program, and if it is not, then they are being used for the (purported) benefit of the whole group of students.The key precedent, Grutter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:58 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 7:15 am
As the Court put it in Grutter v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
In contrast, on that same day in a 6-3 decision, the Court held that the university’s undergraduate admissions policy, which automatically awarded points to applicants from certain racial minority groups, violated the Equal Protection Clause (Gratz v Bollinger). [read post]
