Search for: "Grutter v. Bollinger"
Results 161 - 180
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm
Instead, Kennedy makes clear that Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 1:21 pm
University of Texas at Austin is a sound win for diversity and Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:04 am
The Supreme Court had just handed down its decision in Grutter v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am
Bollinger), race-conscious efforts to avoid discrimination against nonwhites (Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
He notes that on the day in 2003 when the Court reaffirmed the ability of universities to consider race in admissions, in Grutter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
And, of course, the new decision makes a dead letter of the Court’s caveat in its 2003 Grutter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
The vote in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 am
Citing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent in Fisher I, Grutter v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), and Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:21 am
Moreover, back in 2003, Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor set the timer after the case of Grutter v Bollinger 539 U.S. 306 (2003), suggesting the affirmative action should not be a necessary tool within 25 years. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The Meaning of “Sunsetting” Language in Grutter The conservative justices invoked language from the end of Justice O’Connor’s majority opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
Bollinger, university officials moved quickly to adopt their own “Grutter”-style policy. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
” Twenty-five years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:06 am
Remember when Justice Sandra Day O’Connor predicted in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2003 a bare five-person Court majority allowed the University of Michigan law school (in Grutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
Bollinger decision affirming the validity of diversity in education as a compelling state interest. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
Abigail Fisher, after all, doesn’t ask the Court to overturn its endorsement, in Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
In Fisher I, a seven-to-one majority declined to question the Court’s prior precedents (including its seminal 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
