Search for: "Guadalupe v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Orozco-Hernandez (Maria Guadalupe) v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Chris v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:14 pm
The suit was dismissed by the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Colemans appealed. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm
There are ways of dealing with code enforcement departments that are not following the rules: you may be able to defeat the charges in a criminal or administrative case (or an appeal of an administrative case to Superior Court), you may be able to convince Code Enforcement that they are not following the rules; you can comply with the request even if it is not technically correct. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
In Alberto v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
San Diego County Superior Court (Guadalupe T. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:40 pm
San Diego County Superior Court, (CA Sup. [read post]
28 May 2008, 10:07 am
Superior Court. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:59 pm
Superior Court (Benitez), S142892. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:53 pm
Confirming my analysis that San Luis Obispo Superior Court is a pretty conservative place, the trial court reduced the number to an even $5 million, even taking away the seventy-six cents.The Court of Appeal took away the rest, on the ground that Avila and Guadalupe were dissimilar incidents. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Guadalupe-Rivera, No. 05-1939 Sentence for charges involving drug distribution and firearm violations is affirmed over defendant's contentions that the district court: 1) abused its discretion in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether certain prior convictions on which the court based his sentence were actually part of the instant offense; and 2) erred in relying on his confidential juvenile record without disclosing the content of that record to him. [read post]
