Search for: "Gump v. Gump"
Results 1 - 20
of 536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2007, 4:24 am
Their lawsuit had asserted 11 causes of action against Akin Gump, but Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried ruled Thursday in Veras v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
On the main page, Dennis posted about a case raising somewhat similar ethical concerns, United Cannabis Corporation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Here is a well written decision concerning Akin Gump in which some causes of action are dismissed. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:17 am
Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP; [2011] EWCA Civ 1574; [2011] WLR (D) 39 “As regards quantification and repayment, a third party assessment under section 71 of the Solicitors Act 1974 was of limited use to a third party, since, after payment, it was not possible to require solicitors to pay to the third party money which they had received from their client and which the client was bound to pay them, merely because the third party was not… [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
EPA, available for download here is a memorandum (issued by Akin Gump) discussing the rationale and potential consequences of the Court's Mass. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
The Sydow Firm v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 2:00 pm
Mike Small of Akin Gump's LA office is counsel of record on this newly-filed amicus brief supporting the respondent on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in the case of Roper v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:27 am
Akin Gump Strauss, et al., 5-03-cv-00541(TXWD May 7, 2009, Jury Verdict) [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:50 pm
Today the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, along with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell, filed this cert. petition in Burkey v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:26 am
Today the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, along with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell, is filing this cert. petition in Daniels v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:17 am
Below, Akin Gump’s Scott Street recaps Wednesday’s oral argument in Perdue v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:25 am
Today’s petition of the day is below (NOTE: Akin Gump represents the respondents in this case): Note: Akin Gump represents the respondents in this case.Title: Sorrell v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Apparently, Wal-Mart hired Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld to analyze... [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
Earlier today, Akin Gump filed this cert petition (with appendix) in Level 3 Communications v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:32 am
v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:21 pm
Below, Akin Gump’s Scott Street previews Perdue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
Yesterday, in conjunction with the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Akin Gump filed this cert. petition in the case of Cone v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:24 am
But the Appellate Division, 1st Department ruled Thursday in Veras v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:35 pm
At issue in the case (in which Akin Gump represents the petitioner) is whether 29 C.F.R. 825.220(d),... [read post]
