Search for: "HALL v. HEARD"
Results 141 - 160
of 704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 4:01 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat yesterday gave judgment in the case of Vidal-Hall and Others v Google Inc [2014] EWHC 13 (QB). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
(People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
On 10 and 11 December 2013 the Court of Appeal (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Miller v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
" A link to a copy of the email follows: Ex. 32 - Email sent 9-26 about shooting incident.pdf At 9:42 a.m., gunshots were heard at Norris Hall, and by 9:50 a.m., the next fifty students and faculty had fallen, victims of the same shooter as the first two shot. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
(Brack v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:33 am
Singh v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Well, now, this case just might be more interesting than the civil fraud case down the hall. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Well, now, this case just might be more interesting than the civil fraud case down the hall. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
Following the arrest of three journalists covering Just Stop Oil protests last week, Hertfordshire Police Chief, Constable Charlie Hall, introduced new measures to protect legitimate media reporting and commissioned an independent review of the arrests. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Appeals have to be heard and decided by such judges: Would counting the vote of a deceased member violate Article III? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor, and Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor, and Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
., not far from the now-empty halls of Congress, a federal appeals court heard arguments in Klayman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
As the Appellate Division held in Mujtaba v NYS Dept. of Education, 148 A.D.2d 819; 107 A.D.3d 1066, “due process does not require that [the charged employee] be present at an administrative hearing, but rather requires notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
As the Appellate Division held in Mujtaba v NYS Dept. of Education, 148 A.D.2d 819; 107 A.D.3d 1066, “due process does not require that [the charged employee] be present at an administrative hearing, but rather requires notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case and the plaintiffs are back in federal court.The case is Catzin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Hall and James Gerometta 4. [read post]
