Search for: "HARDING v. GILLETT" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2009, 1:32 pm
We have been presented with no good reason why compensation should be paid in one instance and not in the other.Gillette v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
In Henry and Mitchell v Henry [2010] UKPC 3, the Privy Council have given further consideration to the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Ever since Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) dragged equivalence into the UK patent infringement system there has been an open question regarding the future of the so-called 'Gillette defence'. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
  It has its origins in the Gillette defence. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm by Adam Gillette
Some might remember that the parties in Lochner v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
David worked very hard for many years on Peter’s farm and was given to understand that he would inherit the farm on Peter’s death. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-688, Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v. [read post]