Search for: "HARLOW v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2020, 11:15 am
Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia found in The Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
** The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, citing Harlow v Fitzgerald, 457 US 800, said that qualified immunity may be claimed by public officers and employees in civil suits seeking damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:35 pm
Harlow v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Because this will be done outside the formal deposition process, however, the usual safeguards regarding relevance and accuracy are no longer in place.-- David Harlow [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
"); Harlow v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:10 am
State,PD-0457-07, April Harlow v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:21 am
The logic here calls to mind Harlow v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:03 am
See 504 U.S. at 166 (conceding that the Court's decision to award qualified immunity in "Harlow v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
’ Harlow v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
” ** Qualified immunity may be claimed by government officials as a defense to liability in an action for civil damages insofar as the act or omission involved did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights that a reasonable person would have known [Harlow v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
See Harlow v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
PD-0457-07, April Harlow v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:51 am
See Harlow v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:47 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
The United States Supreme Court disagreed. [read post]
