Search for: "HARLOW v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
CharonQC, with what was then his fifth Blawg Review (he's since hosted an impressive sixth) started the year off with a welcome from the Baron Mandelson of Foy, Prince of Darkness, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills, Lord President of The Council and Witch Finder-General for H M Government…"You are unwise to lower your defenses" This week, Mike Semple Piggot and his friends at the bar covered a great deal of ground… [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Editor
CharonQC, with what was then his fifth Blawg Review (he's since hosted an impressive sixth) started the year off with a welcome from the Baron Mandelson of Foy, Prince of Darkness, First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills, Lord President of The Council and Witch Finder-General for H M Government…"You are unwise to lower your defenses" This week, Mike Semple Piggot and his friends at the bar covered a great deal of ground… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:58 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0443, 2010 MT 60, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
5 - David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog looks at the GOP's health reform plan. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
5 - David Harlow's Health Care Law Blog looks at the GOP's health reform plan. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
But it is not the issue before this court Comment “But they haven’t done an equality impact assessment” is a fairly common complaint, although even that can be of less use to a challenge than people think; see, for instance, R(Brown) v SSWP [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin) and R(Meany) v Harlow DC [2009] EWHC 559 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
The problem is suits for money damages against individuals must also overcome the hurdle of "qualified immunity," as described by Harlow v. [read post]