Search for: "HARMON v. HARMON" Results 1 - 20 of 1,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Avid asserted two patents against Harmonic, U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
They believed federal law supported their case.In a 1978 decision that reverberated across Indian country and beyond, the Supreme Court struck a blow to their efforts by ruling in Oliphant v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 11:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Avid therefore is entitled to a newtrial on infringement, though satisfaction of this particularclaim element is now settled because Harmonic hasnot here disputed Avid’s contention that Harmonic’ssystem satisfies this claim element when properly construed.Avid has not, however, shown entitlement tomore than a new trial, i.e., to entry of a judgment ofinfringement: the evidence does not compel a finding ofinfringement of the other claim element in dispute—which at… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Dan Markel
Rachel Harmon from UVA had an interesting post to the crimprof listserv that I thought warranted broader exposure, so with her permission I'm sharing it. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The use of a harmonized standard has been long advocated by patent... [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:33 pm by Beth Graham
Strong has authored Why is Harmonization of Common Law and Civil Law Procedures Possible in Arbitration but Not Litigation? [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:31 pm
The Court of Justice handed down a neat judgment in Case C-257/06 Roby Profumi SrL v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
Judge Williams' opinion attempts to harmonize Hughes and the Virginia Supreme Court's later decision in Myseros v. [read post]