Search for: "HARRIS v. ALLEN" Results 1 - 20 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
He ordered Harry to make an interim payment of £60,000 in legal costs to News Group Newspapers after ruling largely in favour of the publisher’s bid for a wider search for evidence. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
The Labour Party is discontinuing its legal claims against Karie Murphy, Seumas Milne, Georgie Robertson, Harry Hayball and Laura Murray on a ‘no order as to costs’ basis. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Mr Justice Fancourt ruled the allegations against the “trophy targets” of Rupert Murdoch and other senior executives made by various claimants including Prince Harry could not be taken to trial as they added “nothing material” to the case and some amounted to a “new case”. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) is the corporate entity defending the case brought by the likes of Prince Harry, Sir Elton John and Doreen Lawrence. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 13 March 2024 there was a Pre-Trial Review in the case of Harrison v Cameron QB-2022-002468. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Allen v Thompson 2024 NY Slip Op 00929 Decided on February 22, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department, in what may be a pyrrhic victory (Defendant attorney is pro-se), is an unusual set of facts. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal compliance,… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Danilack, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Sunday, February 4, 2024 Tags: Activism, AI, Artificial intelligence, data analytics, Environment, litigation, Public disclosures, Risk management, SEC, Sustainability, technology Caremark Claim Based on Business Risks Dismissed Posted by Richard Horvath, Stephen Leitzell, and Taylor Jaszewski, Dechert LLP, on Monday, February 5, 2024 Tags: Business risk, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, In re Caremark, Legal compliance,… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry has dropped his libel case against the publisher of the Mail on Sunday and Mail Online. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Harris (Allen Harris PLLC) represents plaintiff.The post Employers' Talking "About Race—Any Race—With a Constant Drumbeat of Essentialist, Deterministic, and Negative Language" Risks Racial Harassment Liability appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Shill (University of Iowa), on Monday, October 16, 2023 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Shill (University of Iowa), on Monday, October 16, 2023 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
" Chief Justice Roberts wrote two election-law decisions this term, Allen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
Prince Harry’s claim against The Sun publisher News Group Newspapers will proceed to a full trial in the High Court, Duke of Sussex v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 1944 (Ch). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]