Search for: "HARTNESS v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
29 May 2019, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
Conflict Resolution Tool Found to Be Religious In 2014, the EEOC, in a case designated EEOC v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In that proceeding Employee had alleged that the Village had breached the collective bargaining agreement by failing to provide him with disability retiree health insurance coverage.* "By commencing an action at law involving arbitrable issues" pursuant to Article 78 the Appellate Division opined that BPTC and Employee "had waived whatever right [they] had to arbitration," citing Hart v Tri-State Consumer, Inc., 18 AD3d 610. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am by Edith Roberts
She catalogs the justice’s occasional victories, like United States v. [read post]