Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1 - 20 of 2,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 7:35 am
In 2018, the Supreme Court of California turned much of the established law regarding worker classification on its head with its decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:57 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Adam Conrad of King & Spalding, and Peter Menell of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law will review and analyze the oral argument in Teva v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:25 am by Lyle Denniston
” Begun about eight years ago, the case that now bears the title of Peruta v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 1:45 pm
If so, then head to California. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm by Richard M. Re
Federal courts aficionados have been looking forward to the oral argument in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 10:15 am
This published opinion could be headed for the California Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
Related Posts:Texas and California Go Head to Head Over BusinessesTips for Start-ups Trying to Get Investors [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:19 pm by Allison Smith
California Air Resources Board and Morning Star Packing Company v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:19 pm by Allison Smith
California Air Resources Board and Morning Star Packing Company v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]