Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
In the latest episode, California and Texas go head to head. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:45 am
Oral arguments in this case (Chevron v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
The case is Sheetz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:35 am
In 2018, the Supreme Court of California turned much of the established law regarding worker classification on its head with its decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:20 am
Baral v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 2:12 pm
Christopher Sprigman started a Twitter thread contemplating what happens if California disregards or circumvents the order in Tandon v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
Thanks to Rush for the heads up. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
As this Cooley blog reports, Crest v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm
The same Perry attorneys head back to court Tuesday, but their arguments will appear under a new docket name: Perry v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:20 am
You might remember that the first legal challenge to California’s board gender diversity statute, Crest v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:27 pm
Last week the California Supreme Court held its long awaited hearing on Howell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Susan V. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:57 pm
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Adam Conrad of King & Spalding, and Peter Menell of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law will review and analyze the oral argument in Teva v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 8:51 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court turned worker classification on its head when it decided Dynamex Operations West Inc v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:37 am
Delicato Vineyards v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
” The court recently agreed to hear EEOC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:15 am
In a footnote, he cited the following decisions with a California nexus: Gener8, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 1:45 pm
If so, then head to California. [read post]
