Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 81 - 100 of 2,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2018, 12:16 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 110448 (ED CA, June 29, 2018), a California federal magistrate judge, in a recommended finding, concluded that the cutting off of 4 dreadlocks of a Rastafarian inmate during his treatment for a head laceration did not amount to a substantial burden on his free exercise rights.In Wade v. [read post]
, a California damages-only trial over injuries two brothers suffered in a head-on collision with a semi-truck. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:39 am
As such, let's visit the narrative provided under the heading "Facts" in The People, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by Brian Raum
Raum is senior counsel and head of marriage litigation for the Alliance Defense Fund and is a member of the legal team defending the California marriage amendment in the federal lawsuit Perry v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:35 am
Last year in North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:33 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
A short time later, a second collision occurred that involved the motorcyclist, a Honda CR-V and possibly a big-rig, Glace said. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:29 am by Patent Docs
Supreme Court set to consider the patent-eligibility of claims to isolated human DNA in AMP v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Yesterday the US Supreme Court, on a narrow 5-4 majority, ordered the state of California to reduce prison crowding because of inadequate medical care in a case style Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At CNBC, Tucker Higgins reports that Janet Napolitano, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama and now president of the University of California system, “will head to war against President Donald Trump in a blockbuster fight at the Supreme Court,” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:33 pm
Just a quick heads-up on a case the Supreme Court has already accepted for review this term - it's known as Douglas v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:34 pm
She maintains that the "neutral principles" approach of Jones v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
As a result, the court in Pfizer was forced to address head on whether the pass-on defense was available to antitrust defendants in California. [read post]