Search for: "HENRY v. RISK"
Results 441 - 460
of 493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 3:17 am
Anyway, the CLA has an exciting seminar coming up next Wednesday evening at which Henry Carr QC, who represented the famous perfume brands against the smell-alikes in L'Oréal v Bellure, is speaking on the IP/unfair competition aspects of the ECJ's ruling in the comfy climate of Milbank Tweed's London office. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
— Henry Brean, Las Vegas Review-Journal, October 28, 2009 For the moment at least, the Southern Nevada Water Authority has lost the water it hoped to pump to Las Vegas in the first phase of its proposed pipeline across eastern Nevada. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:26 am
The decision in the Supreme Court case of Riegel v Medtronic created special protection for medical device manufacturers that defied all logic and contradicted 30 years of experience in medical device regulation. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
Appeals Court Will Decide, Hopefully, Reasonably Soon By Henry J. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
I see no reason to suppose they did so for any reason other than the considerable downside risk they would avoid" (paragraphs 30-33).This now seems to be the end of the line for Aerotel, in the UK at least. [read post]
16 May 2009, 1:28 pm
NSSTA: Spencer v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:33 am
If passed, it would overturn the Supreme Court decision, Riegel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Burns listed four elements: (1) the "significance and extent of exposure," (2) the "toxicity of [the substance], [and] the seriousness of the [harm] ... for which the individuals are at risk," (3) the "relative increase" in risk "in those exposed," and (4) "monitor[ing] the effects of exposure. . .is reasonable and necessary. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
Vega v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:02 am
On March 4, 2009, Representatives Frank Pallone, JR (D-NJ) and Henry A. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
New York State Restaurant Assoc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
Henry A. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Va. 1987)(Virginia law)(risk management information); Burr v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:45 pm
Caldwell to Krell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:03 am
Or what about Garfield, New Jersey, Archie, Missouri, or Henry, Illinois? [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:58 pm
Or what about Garfield, New Jersey, Archie, Missouri, or Henry, Illinois? [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:20 pm
Cooper jokingly describes this hearing as Paulson v. [read post]
