Search for: "HENRY v. WARNER"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold found that Warner-Lambert continues to apply in the UK and applies to both second medical use and single compounds claims. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 (1978),[1] much like FOIA requesters need have no particular reason to obtain government records. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
IPSO 10070-22 Warner, Eddleston & Eddleston v mirror.co.uk, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 10067-22 Warner, Eddleston & Eddleston v Mail Online, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 10893-22 Lund v westerntelegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy, Resolved – IPSO… [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm
Henry (Indian Child Welfare Act; Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act) U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 2:52 am
Henry Rollins (musician, writer, journalist, publisher, actor, television and radio host, comedian and activist) once said: “Sitting in a room, alone, listening to a CD is to be lonely. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
Lawson sold the movie rights to Warner Bros., and the book became the movie “War Dogs. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:13 am
: Warner v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:25 am
The UK Court took the opportunity to take a view on the application of communication to the public, providing some distinctions which could create clarity or further complexity in this already controversial area of copyright.PartiesThe claimants - Warner Music and Song Music - own or hold the exclusive licences to copyright in sound recordings of music, together accounting for more than half the market for digital sales of recorded music in the UK and about 43% globally.The defendant… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
If you are interested in database licensing, the intrigue of how complex geo-spatial based services are developed, electronic mapping and polygons, the legality of scraping, how online terms governing databases are construed, and database rights, then the recent UK decision in 77m Ltd v Ordnance Survey Ltd [2019] EWHC 3007 (Ch) (08 November 2019) is for you. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
Here is a very long, complex and potentially very important judgement from the UK in Warner v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
If the defendant "knew the risk and decided it was best not to remove it" then that is a factor in favor of maintaining the status quo and granting an injunction (see Aldous LJ in SmithKline Beecham v Apotex [2003] FSR 31 at [40]; see also Arnold J in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 72 at [133]). [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:53 am
For example, quite apart from the mammoth FRAND judgment of Birss J in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case, readers will recall Henry Carr J’s decision of January 2017 in GSK v Wyeth when he considered whether Wyeth was entitled to an account of profits from GSK for future infringements (no injunction had been requested) and whether the Court had jurisdiction to grant such relief. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
However, it is unclear how far this right of integrity could be stretched in the context of performances; a restrictive approach has been followed in the context of authorial works (see Pasterfield v Denham [1999] FSR 168, Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274 (Ch), Harrison v Harrison [2010] FSR 25, compare with Tidy v Trustees of the Natural History Museum (1995) 39 IPR 501).It is not at all… [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
His decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
Now, Senator Warner seeks to create a legal bar as well. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Warner Bros. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
.* I financed it so it's my copyright--well, not reallyKat friend Aaron Wood has provided an edifying summary of a recent case from the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, Henry Hadaway Organisation v Pickwick Group Limited and Ors [2015] EWHC 3407 (IPEC), concerning the vexing question that copyright practitioners know all too well: Who is the owner of the copyright in a recording where one party finances and the other is the creative/organiser? [read post]
