Search for: "HICKS v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am by Jordan Bublick
Bowers, 706 F.2d 1202 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court cited the general rule of Hick v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The trial court denied Tanubagijo's new trial motion and sentenced him to 25 years to life in state prison.People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:22 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
Another is to assert a state law argument, arguing that the trial was not sufficiently speedy to satisfy the rule created by the Court of Appeals in Hicks v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm by Medicare Set Aside Services
LEXIS 19491February 25, 2011, DecidedFebruary 28, 2011, Filed BENJAMIN HICKS, PLAINTIFF vs. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 1:30 pm by Robert Tanha
Indeed, at the very minimum, he would be required, under the rule in Wilson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 am by Matt Bouchard
  Here’s AGC SmartBrief editor Jennifer Hicks’ tweet about the big news from the Lone Star State: $4.8B P3 highway project breaks ground in Texas | ow.ly/pza28 via @Land_Line_Mag #construction— Jennifer Hicks (@SB_AEC) October 07, 2013 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  On the menu was "Obviousness over the common general knowledge", followed by mulled wine and mince pies, all served up by chair Michael Hicks, the man behind the successful obviousness over CGK challenge way back when in Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA & Others [2006] EWHC 1398 (Pat) (first instance) and [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (Court of Appeal). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Discharged for violating his employer’s conduct policy against the use of “abusive or threatening language,” a quality control inspector was unable to convince the New Hampshire Supreme Court that there was a jury issue as to whether state public policy supporting “self-defense” made his discharge wrongful (Leeds v BAE Systems, November 5, 2013, Hicks, G). [read post]