Search for: "HILL v. GRAHAM" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
There are three investigations into the incident, one American, one Afghan, and a joint inquiry write Alissa Rubin and Graham Bowley in the Times. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Moore, University of Washington – Department of Philosophy, January 13, 2012 ’30 Years on: The Review of the Council of Europe Data Protection Convention 108′, Sylvia Kierkegaard, Nigel Waters, Graham Greenleaf, Lee A. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
” Paul Purpura of the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports on challenges faced by Louisiana as it complies with the Court’s 2010 opinion in Graham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
” Paul Purpura of the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports on challenges faced by Louisiana as it complies with the Court’s 2010 opinion in Graham v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Down in DC, the Supreme Court accepted cert in a followup to its decision last year in Graham v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:19 am
Jed Graham, writing at Investor Business Daily's Capital Hill blog, makes this keen observation:"[V]irtually no one understands what the law means or how premium subsidies will grow over time — and it’s a near certainty that the confusion extends to the members of Congress who voted for it. [read post]