Search for: "HINK v. HINK"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2014, 9:10 am
The opinion of the court in Property Reserve, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:10 am
The opinion of the court in Property Reserve, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
by Matthew Hinks Spot zoning - the practice of singling out a parcel of property for either more or less restrictive zoning regulations - does not always constitute an impermissible abuse of discretion according to a new opinion from the California Court of Appeal in Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:02 pm
By Matthew Hinks JMBM has prevailed in the Court of Appeal on behalf of its client in a well-publicized and hotly-contested development project in the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 12:40 pm
That may be the situation with the new California Court of Appeal decision in Bowman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:32 am
A new California Court of Appeal opinion -- Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 12:40 pm
That may be the situation with the new California Court of Appeal decision in Bowman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
A new opinion from the California Court of Appeal in Lockaway Storage v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:04 pm
A new opinion from the California court of appeal, Alliance for the Protection of the Auburn Community Environment v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Schware v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:22 am
“No”, said the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hinke v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:37 pm
” Friends of Lagoon Valley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
By Matthew Hinks The California legislature has declared the availability of housing for every Californian to be a matter of "vital statewide importance." [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
Hinkes, The University of Memphis School of Law Class of 2015 October 24th 2013 In Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:59 am
’s Tire Service v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:39 pm
In the case of Sheetz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:25 pm
[T]he recent decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Monsanto v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:22 pm
Considering the factors set out in Bardal v. [read post]
