Search for: "HINK v. HINK" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by Barbara Moreno
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:02 pm
By Matthew Hinks JMBM has prevailed in the Court of Appeal on behalf of its client in a well-publicized and hotly-contested development project in the City of Los Angeles. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:58 pm
by Matthew Hinks Spot zoning - the practice of singling out a parcel of property for either more or less restrictive zoning regulations - does not always constitute an impermissible abuse of discretion according to a new opinion from the California Court of Appeal in Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
Hinkes, The University of Memphis School of Law Class of 2015 October 24th 2013             In Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm
  Since the United States Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Schware v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
By Matthew Hinks State density bonus law -- one of many California statutes enacted to implement the state's policy of promoting the construction of affordable housing -- has withstood a significant challenge posed by the County of Napa (the "County") in a new California Court of Appeal opinion, Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
By Matthew Hinks The California legislature has declared the availability of housing for every Californian to be a matter of "vital statewide importance." [read post]