Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 61 - 80 of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2010, 10:16 am
This conclusion turned on the finding that Deutsche Bank was a successor to the holder. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:17 pm by David Jacobson
In Westpac Banking Corporation v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2009] FCA 1506 the Federal Court decided that by sending a Westpac Debit MasterCard card to 424,000 of its existing Handycard holders, Westpac had sent such cardholders the Debit MasterCard card in renewal or replacement of, or in substitution for, a card of the same kind previously sent to him or her, being the person’s Handycard, as permitted by section 12DL of the… [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:45 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Foreclosure Opinions Body: AC36024 - Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:23 am
To allow otherwise would be to permit a near-monopoly on the part of the trade mark holder. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]