Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 16,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:17 am
Herewith a cross-post from The Cardinal Lawyer celebrating Whitney v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Our Los Angeles marijuana lawyers, along with many others invested in medical marijuana rights, have been closely following the developments of The City of Riverside v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:59 am by Alexa Kolbi-Molinas
We cannot lose sight of the fact that politicians can effectively outlaw abortion for thousands of people without having to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm by Adam Thimmesch
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm by Patrick Richards
  You have very clearly stated a position I hope is adopted by the Supreme Court in their decision; to rely on the machine-or-transformation test is purely placing form over substance. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 11:29 am
This week at the Supremes: The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Erin Scharff
” When the Supreme Court agreed to review this case, many observers hoped that the court might use it as an opportunity to address tax jurisdiction and provide guidance to taxpayers and states, especially in the wake of last summer’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am by Jessica Arons
That strategy shifted, however, in 2019 when abortion opponents began to hope the Supreme Court would use a near-total ban to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Most notably, however, the court stated that immediate Second Circuit guidance on the issue “will significantly affect the conduct of other lawsuits now pending in the district courts which have relied on other legal standards or the same legal standard, but have come out differently,” specifically citing the decision in Glatt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Paul Caron
Jennifer Lee Koh (Pepperdine), Race, Immigration Law, and Christianity: Reflections and Tensions Raised by United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the individual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of the debate over the limits of federal commerce clause power prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]