Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 16,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:50 am
In a previous post I erroneously stated that the appeal of Canwest Mediaworks Publications v. [read post]
Our criminal defense attorneys in Fort Lauderdale know that this sets an important legal precedent that we hope other jurisdictions will follow, particularly for as long as we continue to have a patchwork of marijuana legislation from state-to-state. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:05 am by Liah Caravalho
The event will mark the 50th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Whilst reg 2(2) was in itself directly discriminatory, it was in Lord Hope’s view important to look at reg 2 as a whole: it was clear that not all UK nationals would be entitled to State Pension Credit, so the 2002 Regulations did not discriminate directly on nationality grounds. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:29 am by Michael Niren
Canadians that need a US visa to enter the United States There are some Canadians who may need a visa to enter the United States, including the E, A, G, V and the K-series of visas. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
The decision of the House of Lords in Limbuela (R (on the application of Limbuela) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2005) UKHL 66, (2006) 1 AC 396) is quite clear on this point; as Lord Hope pointed out “The question whether, and if so in what circumstances, support should be given at the expense of the state to asylum seekers is, of course, an intensely political issue” And, he went on to say, engagement in this “political”… [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:25 am
" *  New York State Senate Republican Campaign Committee, Petitioner v Commission To Investigate Public Corruption, Respondent, Supreme Court, New York County, Index Number 159965/2013. [read post]