Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 16,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Against the backdrop of these alarming figures, the European Court of Human Rights (‘the Court’) has provided a ray of hope with its admissibility decision in Lenis v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm by Josh Blackman
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by David Klein
On November 3, 2023, the United States Supreme Court granted a writ for certiorari in Coinbase Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
EU lawmakers are currently negotiating changes to the Commission text, with hopes of finalizing the text by the end of this year, although many of its obligations would only begin to apply to regulated entities in 2026 or later. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:30 am
And practitioners, yearning for a result, must be careful to state the facts accurately even when they may not seem to lead to a hoped-for result. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
In an increasingly complex state, there’s often overlap of powers. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In general, cloning humans is illegal in the United States and many other countries.I hope this answers your question! [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am by David Hemming (Bristows)
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Phil Dixon
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]